Posted Oct 11, 2006 at 05:25AM by Chris L.
Listed in:
Previews,
Games,
Call of Duty 3
Tags:
Activision,
Wiimote
Ó
|
Xbox 360 screens: PlayStation 3 screens: Wii screens: |
|
|
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
10 Jumps
Netflix service now live on PS3
7 Jumps
MAG Beta Phase 4 now ongoing
70 Comments
|
 |
by ps3 (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
 
|
» ps3
ps3 looks better
ps3 looks better
|
Re: clayton (Unregistered) - 2006-10-31 |
|
|
» ps3+weak
Before and after comparison from ps3 e3 05 to now! The 360 in-game screenshot blow away anything the PS3 can muster up. Below is the link for the comparison, PS3 fanboys don't start crying when you realize you have been lied too. FACT is the 360 is a better games machine performance wise, if you can't see that in the link below you are either blind or a sony fanboy.
http://www.wii60.com/videogames.php?image+1851.jpg
Before and after comparison from ps3 e3 05 to now! The 360 in-game screenshot blow away anything the PS3 can muster up. Below is the link for the comparison, PS3 fanboys don't start crying when you realize you have been lied too. FACT is the 360 is a better games machine performance wise, if you can't see that in the link below you are either blind or a sony fanboy.
http://www.wii60.com/videogames.php?image+1851.jpg
|
by wii (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» wii
wii will PLAY better.
wii will PLAY better.
|
by yahah (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» RETARDS
AND THE FACTS DON'T LIE......
There are three critical performance aspects of a console:
Central Processing Unit (CPU) performance.
The Xbox 360 CPU architecture has three times the general purpose processing power of the Cell.
Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) performance
The Xbox 360 GPU design is more flexible and it has more processing power than the PS3 GPU.
Memory System Bandwidth
The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3's by five times.
AND THE FACTS DON'T LIE......
There are three critical performance aspects of a console:
Central Processing Unit (CPU) performance.
The Xbox 360 CPU architecture has three times the general purpose processing power of the Cell.
Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) performance
The Xbox 360 GPU design is more flexible and it has more processing power than the PS3 GPU.
Memory System Bandwidth
The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3's by five times.
|
by wii (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» wii
again #3, wii will PLAY better
again #3, wii will PLAY better
|
by Truth (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» #3 you’re an idiot
The truth hurts. You can bring a ton of technical jargon but it's pointless. The 360 has sold about 6 million worldwide thus far. PS3 is expecting to surpass whatever lead the 360 had by March 07.
Can you honeslty tell me that you can play Saints Row or any other complex game and it does not freeze. I've even heard of Dead Rising not working to well. I just don't think the machine can handle that.
Upscalled 1080p and add-ons, consumers don't want that. M$ claims to give thier customers a choice. There are a few things that I have to have if I play. Let's see how much that will cost me with 360:
XBOX 360 = $400
Wireless Adapter - $100
Online Gaming - $50 (a year)
Essentials total - $550
All this is included with the PS3 for $50 more, not to mention a ton of other add-ons.
After two years of owning a 360 a person would have paid a total of at least $500 if you include $50 a year in XBL fees.
The truth hurts. You can bring a ton of technical jargon but it's pointless. The 360 has sold about 6 million worldwide thus far. PS3 is expecting to surpass whatever lead the 360 had by March 07.
Can you honeslty tell me that you can play Saints Row or any other complex game and it does not freeze. I've even heard of Dead Rising not working to well. I just don't think the machine can handle that.
Upscalled 1080p and add-ons, consumers don't want that. M$ claims to give thier customers a choice. There are a few things that I have to have if I play. Let's see how much that will cost me with 360:
XBOX 360 = $400
Wireless Adapter - $100
Online Gaming - $50 (a year)
Essentials total - $550
All this is included with the PS3 for $50 more, not to mention a ton of other add-ons.
After two years of owning a 360 a person would have paid a total of at least $500 if you include $50 a year in XBL fees.
|
by Truth (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» #3 you’re an idiot
The truth hurts. You can bring a ton of technical jargon but it's pointless. The 360 has sold about 6 million worldwide thus far. PS3 is expecting to surpass whatever lead the 360 had by March 07.
Can you honestly tell me that you can play Saints Row or any other complex game and it does not freeze? From what I understand Dead Rising does not work to well either. I just don't think the machine can handle it.
Upscalled 1080p and add-ons, consumers don't want that. M$ claims to give their customers a choice. There are a few things that I have to have if I play. Let's see how much that will cost me to own a 360:
XBOX 360 = $400
Wireless Adapter - $100
Online Gaming - $50 (a year)
Essentials total - $550
All this is included with the PS3 for $50 more, not to mention a ton of other additions that come standard.
After two years of owning a 360 a person would have paid a total of at least $500 if you include $50 a year in XBL fees.
The truth hurts. You can bring a ton of technical jargon but it's pointless. The 360 has sold about 6 million worldwide thus far. PS3 is expecting to surpass whatever lead the 360 had by March 07.
Can you honestly tell me that you can play Saints Row or any other complex game and it does not freeze? From what I understand Dead Rising does not work to well either. I just don't think the machine can handle it.
Upscalled 1080p and add-ons, consumers don't want that. M$ claims to give their customers a choice. There are a few things that I have to have if I play. Let's see how much that will cost me to own a 360:
XBOX 360 = $400
Wireless Adapter - $100
Online Gaming - $50 (a year)
Essentials total - $550
All this is included with the PS3 for $50 more, not to mention a ton of other additions that come standard.
After two years of owning a 360 a person would have paid a total of at least $500 if you include $50 a year in XBL fees.
|
by # 3 this is a fact (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» this is a fact
ps3 is 5 times better then the xbox360 . the cell will be the best cpu out not xbox360 and one more fact ps3 had abetter gpu
ps3 is 5 times better then the xbox360 . the cell will be the best cpu out not xbox360 and one more fact ps3 had abetter gpu
|
by Advertising - |
|
|
|
by Re: >> wii (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Re: >> wii
Why do you say the wii will play better? Because of the motion sensitivity and using the wiimote to controle where your gun is pointing? Think about it, what if it is too sensitive to the motion, next thing you know you have a gun going all over the place and you can't control it.
I have some friends who have been lucky enough to play the wii before launch and the fact is the wii isn't going to compete in the graphics department of the console war. So the only way they can make up for it is gameplay now what if the screw up the gameplay for Call Of Duty 3 because It is way to sensitive? There is no reason to play it on the wii anymore, you will play it on you XBOX 360 or PS3.
I have seen a few gameplay videos of Call Of Duty 3 on the wii from when one of my friends got to test it. It looked extremely hard to control the character because it was too sensitive.
I will not be buying this game for the wii, I will be buying it for the 360. It's not that I don't like the wii it's that the wii hasn't proven that its new control system works. And all of you lazy fat gamers out there who want remote disc changers for your 360 sure as hell aren't gonna like this console, cause you are going to get tired of moving you hands and arms all over, its easier to use thumbsticks.
Anyway this game looks amazing and I will definantly buy it and it will probably be one of my favorite games, as Call Of Duty 2 is my favorite game for 360 and always as been. I am looking forward to next weeks release of Splinter Cell: Double Agent. Which is also gonna suck on the wii!
It's starting to look like everything is going to suck on the wii! Well, I guess it's going to be between Microsoft and Sony as Nintendo apeals to little kiddies and adult loser lazy gamers......
Why do you say the wii will play better? Because of the motion sensitivity and using the wiimote to controle where your gun is pointing? Think about it, what if it is too sensitive to the motion, next thing you know you have a gun going all over the place and you can't control it.
I have some friends who have been lucky enough to play the wii before launch and the fact is the wii isn't going to compete in the graphics department of the console war. So the only way they can make up for it is gameplay now what if the screw up the gameplay for Call Of Duty 3 because It is way to sensitive? There is no reason to play it on the wii anymore, you will play it on you XBOX 360 or PS3.
I have seen a few gameplay videos of Call Of Duty 3 on the wii from when one of my friends got to test it. It looked extremely hard to control the character because it was too sensitive.
I will not be buying this game for the wii, I will be buying it for the 360. It's not that I don't like the wii it's that the wii hasn't proven that its new control system works. And all of you lazy fat gamers out there who want remote disc changers for your 360 sure as hell aren't gonna like this console, cause you are going to get tired of moving you hands and arms all over, its easier to use thumbsticks.
Anyway this game looks amazing and I will definantly buy it and it will probably be one of my favorite games, as Call Of Duty 2 is my favorite game for 360 and always as been. I am looking forward to next weeks release of Splinter Cell: Double Agent. Which is also gonna suck on the wii!
It's starting to look like everything is going to suck on the wii! Well, I guess it's going to be between Microsoft and Sony as Nintendo apeals to little kiddies and adult loser lazy gamers......
|
by Hey Retards (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Hey Retards
Xbox live is gonna be better than sonys service so ***** you
Xbox live is gonna be better than sonys service so ***** you
|
by ralph (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Crap
Am I the only one that thinks the Wii version looks like total horse*****? Jaggies, low-res textures, pitiful geometry. I can't believe that people are being paid to make this ***** and that there are idiots out there that would actually pay $250 for that trash console.
By the way, #3, you're a total retard. The real facts are that the PS3 is more powerful than the *****box 360. The Cell is one of the most powerful CPUs on the planet right now. It's being used for a super computer cluster, which will include some PS3s. The RSX is more than capable of matching or surpassing XBox 360 graphics. Blu-Ray will give developers more than enough space to built large immersive games without space restrictions. PS3 is simply better.
Gamepro has a comparisson on their website of the two next-gen systems and that last-gen children's toy (Wii) and the PS3 handily beats the Xbox 360.
No doubt, PS3 FTW come 11/17!
Am I the only one that thinks the Wii version looks like total horse*****? Jaggies, low-res textures, pitiful geometry. I can't believe that people are being paid to make this ***** and that there are idiots out there that would actually pay $250 for that trash console.
By the way, #3, you're a total retard. The real facts are that the PS3 is more powerful than the *****box 360. The Cell is one of the most powerful CPUs on the planet right now. It's being used for a super computer cluster, which will include some PS3s. The RSX is more than capable of matching or surpassing XBox 360 graphics. Blu-Ray will give developers more than enough space to built large immersive games without space restrictions. PS3 is simply better.
Gamepro has a comparisson on their website of the two next-gen systems and that last-gen children's toy (Wii) and the PS3 handily beats the Xbox 360.
No doubt, PS3 FTW come 11/17!
|
by jesus (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» OMFG!!!
To all the posters above me, STFU, you god damn f'ing crap-holes.
The moment a news is posted about a game that will soon be released on all three consoles, retards like you people come jumping on the news siptting out your immature comments. Why cant you write anything about "Call of Duty 3" as a game.. NOT the systems the game will be releasing on.
For me, personally, CoD3 is sounding more intense and realistic.. even better than CoD2. I am excited and will be buying this game when it is released.
Get a f'ing life, people and be mature when posting your comments. Enough of this console wars. Be happy with what you have bought with your hard earned money and let the other person enjoy his!
Thanks!
To all the posters above me, STFU, you god damn f'ing crap-holes.
The moment a news is posted about a game that will soon be released on all three consoles, retards like you people come jumping on the news siptting out your immature comments. Why cant you write anything about "Call of Duty 3" as a game.. NOT the systems the game will be releasing on.
For me, personally, CoD3 is sounding more intense and realistic.. even better than CoD2. I am excited and will be buying this game when it is released.
Get a f'ing life, people and be mature when posting your comments. Enough of this console wars. Be happy with what you have bought with your hard earned money and let the other person enjoy his!
Thanks!
|
by Defsystem (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» oh noes
SEGA GENISIS FTW!!!!
Ok children, did we all forget that as long as the game is awesome it doesn't matter what system you can play it on. Everyone sounds like they are getting a hard on by describing the GPUs, CPUs, ABC's and 123's.
Graphics do not matter.... gameplay does.
It's like having a supermodel as a girlfriend: Pretty to look at, but that's all there is to it.
Also you can have the best system in the world (hardware wise) but what good is it if the developers can't do anything with it.
So there, all the fan boys can argue all they want to, but remember:
Arguing on the Internet is like running in the Special Olympics:Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Laterz
SEGA GENISIS FTW!!!!
Ok children, did we all forget that as long as the game is awesome it doesn't matter what system you can play it on. Everyone sounds like they are getting a hard on by describing the GPUs, CPUs, ABC's and 123's.
Graphics do not matter.... gameplay does.
It's like having a supermodel as a girlfriend: Pretty to look at, but that's all there is to it.
Also you can have the best system in the world (hardware wise) but what good is it if the developers can't do anything with it.
So there, all the fan boys can argue all they want to, but remember:
Arguing on the Internet is like running in the Special Olympics:Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Laterz
|
by Muscrat (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Grrr
I AM NOT BUYING COD 3
I`d rather wait for the Infinaty ward COD4 than get, no.3; the dev's making it did the console COD's and Big Red One.
Seriously the best thing about COD 1 (best cod by a mile) and 2 was the ease of KB + mouse, and the plentiful mods that follow. A COD LAN is great.
I reckon 3 may score around the 80% mark, juding by the previous consolised CODs minus COD 2. If i find out it has co-op THEN i might think about it. Honestly i`d rather Resistance or Motorstorm, let alone Warhawk.
I AM NOT BUYING COD 3
I`d rather wait for the Infinaty ward COD4 than get, no.3; the dev's making it did the console COD's and Big Red One.
Seriously the best thing about COD 1 (best cod by a mile) and 2 was the ease of KB + mouse, and the plentiful mods that follow. A COD LAN is great.
I reckon 3 may score around the 80% mark, juding by the previous consolised CODs minus COD 2. If i find out it has co-op THEN i might think about it. Honestly i`d rather Resistance or Motorstorm, let alone Warhawk.
|
by dr grim (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» number 3 is a retard
ps3 cpu-cell (3.2 ghz power-based ppe with seven 3.2ghz spes) 167(aprox)gflops 10 billion dot products per second
xbox360 cpu-3.2 ghz ibm powerpc tri-core 115 gflops
9.1 billion dot products per second
ps3 wins in cpu
ps3 memory-256 mb XDR @ 3.2 GHZ
256 mb GDDR3 @ 700 MHZ
xbox360 memory-512 mb gddr3 @ 700 mhz shared between cpu and gpu 10 mb embedded edram
ps3 win in memory before u say xbox hads better memory look at the specs.u know bill gates is a lair he say 360 is better but it not f bill gates
ps3 gpu-550 MHZ RSX( based on nvidia G70 architecture) 2 tflops (theoretical) 74.8 billion shader operation per second (100 billion with the cpu)
33 billion dot products per second (51 billion with cpu)
dot products per second distinct pixel and vertex shaders, sm3.0
xbox360 gpu-500 MHZ xenos(ATI custom design) 1 tflops
(syetem theoretical)48 billon shader operation per second
24 billion dot products per second (33.6 billion per secondt heoretical maximum when summed with cpu operation)unified shaders,sm3.0 + 10 mb edram (internal bandwidth of 256gb/s)
ps3 wins here to but power donot metter its the game that do
ps3 cpu-cell (3.2 ghz power-based ppe with seven 3.2ghz spes) 167(aprox)gflops 10 billion dot products per second
xbox360 cpu-3.2 ghz ibm powerpc tri-core 115 gflops
9.1 billion dot products per second
ps3 wins in cpu
ps3 memory-256 mb XDR @ 3.2 GHZ
256 mb GDDR3 @ 700 MHZ
xbox360 memory-512 mb gddr3 @ 700 mhz shared between cpu and gpu 10 mb embedded edram
ps3 win in memory before u say xbox hads better memory look at the specs.u know bill gates is a lair he say 360 is better but it not f bill gates
ps3 gpu-550 MHZ RSX( based on nvidia G70 architecture) 2 tflops (theoretical) 74.8 billion shader operation per second (100 billion with the cpu)
33 billion dot products per second (51 billion with cpu)
dot products per second distinct pixel and vertex shaders, sm3.0
xbox360 gpu-500 MHZ xenos(ATI custom design) 1 tflops
(syetem theoretical)48 billon shader operation per second
24 billion dot products per second (33.6 billion per secondt heoretical maximum when summed with cpu operation)unified shaders,sm3.0 + 10 mb edram (internal bandwidth of 256gb/s)
ps3 wins here to but power donot metter its the game that do
|
by Gamerz22 (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Disappointed
Wii version should be fun, but they did bad on the graphics. If the Wii is better than the GC in graphics, then Call for Duty could get close to at least Metroid Prime quality of GC.... GG
Wii version should be fun, but they did bad on the graphics. If the Wii is better than the GC in graphics, then Call for Duty could get close to at least Metroid Prime quality of GC.... GG
|
by Bush administration (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Getting it for 360
Not because I give a shizt about loyalty to a freaken company, but because its going to be online enabled and thats what made cod2 so much fun for the 360. Nintendo already said that the Wii will not support games online untill 2007. Sony has two problems: 1) Their whole aproach to gaming online is kind of a big f' you to the player. Making it up to the game companies to support online or not (we saw how that ended up for ps2). 2) Seeing as how its going to be almost impossible to score a ps3 at launch even if i wanted one (and i remind you cod3 is coming out at around ps3 launch) I wouldn't want to wait 3 months to play a game thats already out. I dont really care if nintendo, sony or microsoft win the "CONSOLE WAR TM" i just want to play my god damn games.
Not because I give a shizt about loyalty to a freaken company, but because its going to be online enabled and thats what made cod2 so much fun for the 360. Nintendo already said that the Wii will not support games online untill 2007. Sony has two problems: 1) Their whole aproach to gaming online is kind of a big f' you to the player. Making it up to the game companies to support online or not (we saw how that ended up for ps2). 2) Seeing as how its going to be almost impossible to score a ps3 at launch even if i wanted one (and i remind you cod3 is coming out at around ps3 launch) I wouldn't want to wait 3 months to play a game thats already out. I dont really care if nintendo, sony or microsoft win the "CONSOLE WAR TM" i just want to play my god damn games.
|
by Advertising - |
|
|
|
by Timmy A (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» ...
Everybody please stop spouting crap about specs, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Facts when comparing X360 cpu (xenon) to PS3 cpu (Cell):
Both 3.2ghz
X360 is tri-core, 64bit, two thread per core
PS3 Cell is 64bit, 7 operational independant SPE (ie self suficient threads)
Ideal code perfomce Cell can outstrip Xenon
Generic code performance, Xenon outstrips Cell
Real world, specifically designed game performance: EXACTLY THE SAME!!!
And please don't compare X360/PS3 screens to Wii for COD3. The Wii has been given the exact same version as the Xbox and PS2, with updated controls. The reason for this is that Activision anticipated the Wii to be a flop when they began production. They are using Wii as a dumping ground, just like EA and Ubisoft were, but Ubisoft seems to be coming round. Remember these three companies releases early days on DS which they also used as a dumping ground? Absolute crap! Gaming would be a lot better of today without the major publishers.
Everybody please stop spouting crap about specs, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Facts when comparing X360 cpu (xenon) to PS3 cpu (Cell):
Both 3.2ghz
X360 is tri-core, 64bit, two thread per core
PS3 Cell is 64bit, 7 operational independant SPE (ie self suficient threads)
Ideal code perfomce Cell can outstrip Xenon
Generic code performance, Xenon outstrips Cell
Real world, specifically designed game performance: EXACTLY THE SAME!!!
And please don't compare X360/PS3 screens to Wii for COD3. The Wii has been given the exact same version as the Xbox and PS2, with updated controls. The reason for this is that Activision anticipated the Wii to be a flop when they began production. They are using Wii as a dumping ground, just like EA and Ubisoft were, but Ubisoft seems to be coming round. Remember these three companies releases early days on DS which they also used as a dumping ground? Absolute crap! Gaming would be a lot better of today without the major publishers.
|
by uy (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» ya
Apparantly none of you are computer programmers because if you understood technical computing functions in the slightest way you would realize that the way the XBOX 360's CPU and GPU are outlined give it far superior flexibility and raw power...
You people are seriously retarded
Apparantly none of you are computer programmers because if you understood technical computing functions in the slightest way you would realize that the way the XBOX 360's CPU and GPU are outlined give it far superior flexibility and raw power...
You people are seriously retarded
|
by Vietone - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Comparing two different systems
For one you cant compare the power of the Xbox360 vs the PS3 in default benchmarks.
The Cell is indeed the better processor for certain applications and the Xenon is better for certain applications.
The Cell is a raw power processor. It crushes the Xbox360 CPU in terms of raw power. This means that games will have better features that require raw processing power like physics.
The Xbox360 CPU is the same as desktop CPUs, its added features give it the extra boost for applications and calculations. So it works better in transferring data from one peripheral to another. This is why you wont see cell processor used in applications that require large amount of data to be sent back and forth.
Now on with the graphics cards, both are nearly equal in power. Both have their advantages and weaknesses and the PC counterparts prove that.
Its like the 7800 vs the 1800. Both run better at certain games and both have advantages above the other and to say that one is far superior to the other is just being stupid.
Flexability and power are not the problem with the PS3. Its a new way of programming. Developers only said it was hard because its different. How many people easily made the transition from every version of photoshop with no hurdles? There isnt one person out there who had a smooth transition from version to version, something moved, new features, means that you need to rework yourself around it.
For one you cant compare the power of the Xbox360 vs the PS3 in default benchmarks.
The Cell is indeed the better processor for certain applications and the Xenon is better for certain applications.
The Cell is a raw power processor. It crushes the Xbox360 CPU in terms of raw power. This means that games will have better features that require raw processing power like physics.
The Xbox360 CPU is the same as desktop CPUs, its added features give it the extra boost for applications and calculations. So it works better in transferring data from one peripheral to another. This is why you wont see cell processor used in applications that require large amount of data to be sent back and forth.
Now on with the graphics cards, both are nearly equal in power. Both have their advantages and weaknesses and the PC counterparts prove that.
Its like the 7800 vs the 1800. Both run better at certain games and both have advantages above the other and to say that one is far superior to the other is just being stupid.
Flexability and power are not the problem with the PS3. Its a new way of programming. Developers only said it was hard because its different. How many people easily made the transition from every version of photoshop with no hurdles? There isnt one person out there who had a smooth transition from version to version, something moved, new features, means that you need to rework yourself around it.
|
by dr grim (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» You people are seriously retarded u cannot read specs ps3 is far better
ps3 cpu-cell (3.2 ghz power-based ppe with seven 3.2ghz spes) 167(aprox)gflops 10 billion dot products per second
xbox360 cpu-3.2 ghz ibm powerpc tri-core 115 gflops
9.1 billion dot products per second
ps3 wins in cpu
ps3 memory-256 mb XDR @ 3.2 GHZ
256 mb GDDR3 @ 700 MHZ
xbox360 memory-512 mb gddr3 @ 700 mhz shared between cpu and gpu 10 mb embedded edram
ps3 win in memory before u say xbox hads better memory look at the specs.u know bill gates is a lair he say 360 is better but it not f bill gates
ps3 gpu-550 MHZ RSX( based on nvidia G70 architecture) 2 tflops (theoretical) 74.8 billion shader operation per second (100 billion with the cpu)
33 billion dot products per second (51 billion with cpu)
dot products per second distinct pixel and vertex shaders, sm3.0
xbox360 gpu-500 MHZ xenos(ATI custom design) 1 tflops
(syetem theoretical)48 billon shader operation per second
24 billion dot products per second (33.6 billion per secondt heoretical maximum when summed with cpu operation)unified shaders,sm3.0 + 10 mb edram (internal bandwidth of 256gb/s)
ps3 wins here
IBM WAS THE ONE WHO SAID PS3 IS FAR BETTER THAN XBOX360 READ THE F@##ING SPECS BEFOR U TALK DUM ASS
ps3 cpu-cell (3.2 ghz power-based ppe with seven 3.2ghz spes) 167(aprox)gflops 10 billion dot products per second
xbox360 cpu-3.2 ghz ibm powerpc tri-core 115 gflops
9.1 billion dot products per second
ps3 wins in cpu
ps3 memory-256 mb XDR @ 3.2 GHZ
256 mb GDDR3 @ 700 MHZ
xbox360 memory-512 mb gddr3 @ 700 mhz shared between cpu and gpu 10 mb embedded edram
ps3 win in memory before u say xbox hads better memory look at the specs.u know bill gates is a lair he say 360 is better but it not f bill gates
ps3 gpu-550 MHZ RSX( based on nvidia G70 architecture) 2 tflops (theoretical) 74.8 billion shader operation per second (100 billion with the cpu)
33 billion dot products per second (51 billion with cpu)
dot products per second distinct pixel and vertex shaders, sm3.0
xbox360 gpu-500 MHZ xenos(ATI custom design) 1 tflops
(syetem theoretical)48 billon shader operation per second
24 billion dot products per second (33.6 billion per secondt heoretical maximum when summed with cpu operation)unified shaders,sm3.0 + 10 mb edram (internal bandwidth of 256gb/s)
ps3 wins here
IBM WAS THE ONE WHO SAID PS3 IS FAR BETTER THAN XBOX360 READ THE F@##ING SPECS BEFOR U TALK DUM ASS
|
by P034AKA JOKER (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» I WORK FOR computer programmING
DONT SAY XBOX360 IS BETTER WHEN IT IS NOT. ALL OF YA XBOX GAYBOYS KNOW PS3 IS FAR BETTER
DONT SAY XBOX360 IS BETTER WHEN IT IS NOT. ALL OF YA XBOX GAYBOYS KNOW PS3 IS FAR BETTER
|
by GamesFan (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» #11
I agreed 100% (although I wouldn't use the same language ;)).
And #20, would you please shutup about specs, you're adding nothing new to an arguement which has raged since before E3 2005. Besides, you're like many I've seen when it comes to console specs, using the same kind of logic which suggests that the fastest athlete MUST be the one with the longest legs, and the smartest guy MUST be the one with the biggest head :p
Anyway, going back to COD3....
I agreed 100% (although I wouldn't use the same language ;)).
And #20, would you please shutup about specs, you're adding nothing new to an arguement which has raged since before E3 2005. Besides, you're like many I've seen when it comes to console specs, using the same kind of logic which suggests that the fastest athlete MUST be the one with the longest legs, and the smartest guy MUST be the one with the biggest head :p
Anyway, going back to COD3....
|
by Joe Dirt (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» #21
I'm sure you do work for a "computer programmING". Why don't you get to work on that key board of yours? The CAP key is broken.
I'm sure you do work for a "computer programmING". Why don't you get to work on that key board of yours? The CAP key is broken.
|
by Shini (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» ugh...omgwtfbbq
wow....who gives a crap about what system is better on paper, Its all up to the game developers on how the game looks...
The real FACTS are....The PS3 and 360 screens both look B-E-A-UTIFUL! How can you guys fight over screen shots that look AMAZING on BOTH systems. get a life already people.
wow....who gives a crap about what system is better on paper, Its all up to the game developers on how the game looks...
The real FACTS are....The PS3 and 360 screens both look B-E-A-UTIFUL! How can you guys fight over screen shots that look AMAZING on BOTH systems. get a life already people.
|
by bob (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» hmm
I honestly dont see a difference in the PS3 and 360 screens .
To the guy who said "You people are seriously retarded u cannot read specs ps3 is far better"
You're the retard if you instantly look at specs and say something is better..yes the cell is faster at certain things but not everything and though on paper ps3 sounds faster the system isnt as efficient as 360.
I honestly dont see a difference in the PS3 and 360 screens .
To the guy who said "You people are seriously retarded u cannot read specs ps3 is far better"
You're the retard if you instantly look at specs and say something is better..yes the cell is faster at certain things but not everything and though on paper ps3 sounds faster the system isnt as efficient as 360.
|
by cheeto_blue - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» #12
#12, you are my hero...
#12, you are my hero...
|
by Advertising - |
|
|
|
by AzaMcWazza (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» I don't think
that just cause the Wii has a new controller that it will be any better, but I'm hoping. What startles me, is the extreme lower quality of the Wii version. I don't think this is a problem with the Wii (It's able to do a lot of NICE stuff, just not in HD) I think the developers have skimped and forgone a lot of the lighting nicities that are afforded the other versions.
that just cause the Wii has a new controller that it will be any better, but I'm hoping. What startles me, is the extreme lower quality of the Wii version. I don't think this is a problem with the Wii (It's able to do a lot of NICE stuff, just not in HD) I think the developers have skimped and forgone a lot of the lighting nicities that are afforded the other versions.
|
by Mau (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Hey
I pretty much agre with number 16.
Ill get it for the X360 bc it will be better online and stuff.!
I pretty much agre with number 16.
Ill get it for the X360 bc it will be better online and stuff.!
|
by Acouto (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» Guys check your facts Im a fan of both systems
Ive seen both screens on both systems , they are IDENTICAL, its proven look it up u ps3 fanyboy *****s. And the retard that said xbox gayboys, wtf by saying that u automatically become a ps3 gayboy, not to mention everyone whining and the damn ps3 hasnt even been released yet.
im sorry but truth is PS3 = XBOX360
Its a tie, and any one with at least a couple of years of computer experience can tell you that. So i will be getting both.
Ive seen both screens on both systems , they are IDENTICAL, its proven look it up u ps3 fanyboy *****s. And the retard that said xbox gayboys, wtf by saying that u automatically become a ps3 gayboy, not to mention everyone whining and the damn ps3 hasnt even been released yet.
im sorry but truth is PS3 = XBOX360
Its a tie, and any one with at least a couple of years of computer experience can tell you that. So i will be getting both.
|
by Saboa (Unregistered) - 2006-10-11 |
|
|
» It's all about the gameplay but.....
we've been lied to.
No way is the Wii a GC+ if those screenies are anything to go by. They are like PS2 launch graphics from 5 years ago!
we've been lied to.
No way is the Wii a GC+ if those screenies are anything to go by. They are like PS2 launch graphics from 5 years ago!
Contact Us:
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - November
| Most Commented | |
| (103) | |
| (43) | |
| (39) | |
| (35) | |
| (34) | |
| (31) | |
| (30) | |
| (29) | |
| (29) | |
| (23) | |
| (22) | |
| (21) | |
| (21) | |
| (21) | |
| (21) | |
| (20) | |
| (19) | |
| (19) | |
| (17) | |
| (17) | |
User Favorites - November
Accessories
(255)Applications
(59)Artwork
(95)Blu-Ray
(429)Cell Processor
(80)Cheats
(3)Controller
(234)Deals
(195)Events
(244)Firmware
(155)Games
(10517)Hacks and Exploits
(88)Homebrew
(65)How-To
(48)Humor
(80)Imports
(18)Interviews
(1470)Linux
(53)Mods
(57)Netcasts
(12)News
(11176)Off Topic
(1105)On Shelves This Week
(32)Opinions & Analysis
(1320)PlayStation Network
(1730)Previews
(663)QuickJump QuickPeek
(36)Reviews
(29)Rumors
(1110)Scans
(180)Screenshots
(917)Site News
(55)Videos
(2582)Weekend Warrior
(37)
Titles
Archives
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
