|
|
|
|
[Via Gta4.net]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
26 Comments
|
"4. Xbox 360 vs PS3- Dan Houser of Rockstar says that the idea is to not have any hint of bias towards any of the platforms. He says there won't be any differences between the versions for each console."
Ouch said the PS3 user which thought their system would have the better visuals and gameplay.
ouch said the 360 owner when he found out a console thats been out for a year and a half is being matched with a console being out for 6 months
Ouch said the PS3 user who payed $600
Ouch said a bored 360 fanboy talking about the PS3.
skidz - You only show yourself to be a fanboy with that comment (and if you're going to make such comments, direct them at other fanboys, not ALL fans/users).
lolyounoob - Both consoles are similar in power. The time difference between the consoles is meaningless since it's mostly due to the PS3 delay (remember spring 2006?). So your comment is no different than a 360 fanboy saying that the new 6 month old console could ONLY match a console which was 1.5 years OLD! It goes both ways.
666 - Correct. :)
blu ray caused the delay
Ouch......... i bit my tounge
2nd
hey lolyounoob ... shouldn't that be the other way around you tit. you PS3 owners should be pi$$ed that your 6 months old console is being outdone by a console thats been out for a year and a half.
you tit head.
If that wear the case. But the fact remains that the 360 is holding the PS3 back because of cross platform development. First party games already show this.
That's completely wrong.
As we saw last gen, the strongest format usually got the best version of multiformat games. Usually that format was the XBox, or if available, the PC.
The weaker formats HELD THEMSELVES BACK! In otherwords, it was the PS2 and GC which tended to have worse looking textures, worse framerate, less polygons, worse lighting etc, compared to the XBox version.
Was the XBox held back because of the PS2 and GC? NO! Was the PC version held back because of the weaker consoles? No! Yes they *may* have pushed the game further was an exclusive, but for multiformat games, the XBox and PC showed they were was more powerful.
The only time you see a bad example of one format effecting another is with quick ports. But a port is not the same a game being simultaneously developed for multiple formats.
So this idea that the 360 is holding the PS3 back is complete nonsense. The PS3 should be getting the best looking and best performing versions of multiformat games if it were as powerful as some gamers believe. However, if you believe the multiformat devs who say the two consoles are similar in terms of power, then the simularities between games on 360 and PS3 actually makes sense (unless you're in denial that is).
If you're saying the PS3 is being held back on the basis that the games are not exclusive to the PS3, then the same can be argued in favour of the 360, i.e. the PS3 is holding the 360 back because of cross platform developement.
Hence that's nothing new, that's just the way it is with multformat games. However, it's not always the case that exclusives are better than their multiformat counterparts. Exclusivity only offers the potential for devs to do more with the hardware. A challenge which not all devs can rise to.
"The weaker formats HELD THEMSELVES BACK! In otherwords, it was the PS2 and GC which tended to have worse looking textures, worse framerate, less polygons, worse lighting etc"
That's right.
PS3 games are not being held back because of the 360, that's just one of a long line of excuses coming from those who refuse to admit that the 360 and PS3 are roughly equal in power. To put it another way, the PS3 is being held back by the 360 as much as the 360 is being held back by the PS3 for cross platform games!
If the PS3 version of a game is not as good as some hope, that's due mostly to game design, the talent and experience of the devs and the limitations of the hardware. It not because of the 360.
For example, before launch, SO many gamers here assumed that Blu-ray's capacity automatically meant higher resolution textures in PS3 games compared to the 360, when it didn't, because storage is only ONE part of a long process of getting graphics onto the screen. So when they see identical textures in
a 360/PS3 game today, they blame it on the 360, despite the fact that last gen the GC and PS2 usually had the worse textures whilst the XBox and PC usually had the best in cross platform games (of course, lazy ports are a different matter!).
It's true that cross platform development means some compromises have to be made, but that effects ALL the platforms involved, not just one.
So to summarise, compromises are going to effect the weakest console much more than they effect the strongest, resulting in a poorer version of the game on THAT machine. So it's no point blaming the 360 console for PS3 cross platform games that fall short of overly high expectations.
Ok, I said enough now.... :)
Dunno whats wrong with all this fanboyism thats going around...I don't have any of the systems but plan on buying both very soon because each brings something different to the table right? so stop this, "my system is better than yours" crap ok?
As long as everyone knows that PS3 has the most advance set up. Ask any Geek (which i am) which system is the most advance and has the most processing power its going to be the PS3 no doubt manly because tech savvy Geeks don't buy into systems and just build computer. They have an un-bios decision. Go ahead i dare you to ask. haha go to Geek squad.
not to be off topic but where the hell is the f ucking news about Crackdown and Halo 3 demo you should change you name to SJ or CJ s-sh1t c-crap
go suck peter moores d1ck you queer
Somebody is mad because there pos3 doesn't have any good games nor demos to play, or is it that they just got word that MGS4 is coming to XBOX360
"Peter north" its not about which games are out know its about which games are going to come out. Need i remind you Sony will have the PS3 out for 10 years and no system will beat it in that ten years because it will have constant support unlike xbox360 which will be around for probably 5 more years, and if they try to stay with the ps3 they will loose because the ps3 is much more advanced like RickyREM said so in 5 years ps3 will still be top of the line but xbox360 wont and still have lots of games being produced then thats were the xbox360 fans come in buying ps3's because of the created infanstructure of the ps3 to be around another 4 years after that.
I don't want to say it but I told you so, bias psm magazine 360 limiting GTA my ass, now you friggin sony fanboys see the truth grand theft auto 4 is going to be awesome on xbox 360 and ps3 the difference is that I paid 400 and you got ripped off for 200 bucks blu ray is for movies ONLY, talladega nights anyone. LOL
I am so happy rockstar came out and set the story straight, looks like all those people that thought GTA 4 was going to be better on ps3 is rethinking now. LOL I am so happy. yeppie yeppitie yeh
I remember the GTA 3 filling up dvd9 on xbox, and people thought GTA 4 could not work on dvd9 what people dont realize is that xbox games never used compression, but xbox 360 games are using compression, go learn about it people, Microsoft is a SOFTWARE company duh, sony did not use compression for ps3 cause they did not have to they are using blu ray so they could make money off movies sales remember sony invented blu ray duh so why would they use dvd9. anyway compression + dvd9 = Just fine for next gen games, damn I am happy right now this news made my day.
Flame if you want sony fanboys it will just make me look even more right HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
Rockstar are no strangers to compression themselves, check out Vice City Stories on the PSP's tiny 1.8GB UMDs, it's on Par with the PS2 version of Vice City!
where are all the sony boys, they lose an argument and they are no where to be found, come in sony boys and jump the article up like you did the first time bunch of sore losers. HA HA HA HA sore losers
BURN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ouch said the ps3 user whoo.... awwwww screw it playstation is better...
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
| Most Commented | |
| (66) | |
| (43) | |
| (39) | |
| (35) | |
| (35) | |
| (34) | |
| (30) | |
| (29) | |
| (29) | |
| (23) | |
| (23) | |
| (21) | |
| (21) | |
| (21) | |
| (20) | |
| (19) | |
| (19) | |
| (17) | |
| (17) | |
| (17) | |
Accessories
(255)Applications
(59)Artwork
(95)Blu-Ray
(429)Cell Processor
(80)Cheats
(3)Controller
(234)Deals
(195)Events
(244)Firmware
(155)Games
(10526)Hacks and Exploits
(88)Homebrew
(65)How-To
(48)Humor
(80)Imports
(18)Interviews
(1470)Linux
(53)Mods
(57)Netcasts
(12)News
(11184)Off Topic
(1105)On Shelves This Week
(32)Opinions & Analysis
(1320)PlayStation Network
(1732)Previews
(663)QuickJump QuickPeek
(36)Reviews
(29)Rumors
(1111)Scans
(180)Screenshots
(917)Site News
(55)Videos
(2584)Weekend Warrior
(37)
Titles
Archives
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005


